Further indication that Baum didn't consider fish to be the brightest animals around, at least in his fantasy stories, occurs in The Sea Fairies. Here, the mermaids grant Trot and Cap'n Bill the ability to communicate with all undersea animals, and they run into a group of mackerel that are excited about the death of one of their number. They claim that Flippity has "gone to glory," which is more or less their version of Heaven, by biting on a fishhook. The pun that they're holy mackerel is implied but never explicitly stated. The mermaid Merla states, "I've seen fishes gather around a hook and look at it carefully for a long time. They all know it is a hook and that if they bite the bait upon it they will be pulled out of the water. But they are curious to know what will happen to them afterward, and think it means happiness instead of death. So finally one takes the hook and disappears, and the others never know what becomes of him." She goes on to say that the mermaids have told them what really happens, but the fish are too stupid to listen. This might not be so bad, however, because many other animals need to eat fish to survive, and if no one did they would become too numerous. Circle of life, and all that. While I can certainly see Merla's reasoning, would this apply to Oz? Ozma is presented as being kind and sympathetic in a different way from the mermaids, and I'm not sure I can imagine her saying, "Well, it's okay to eat fish, even though they're technically my subjects, because they're stupid." So I don't know that there's a definite answer here, but we do see fishermen in Oz from time to time, with no indication that they're considered horrible murderers.
Polychrome Window
-
I've wanted to do a stained glass piece based on this illustration by John
R. Neill, from 1909's *The Road to Oz,* for a long time. The image shows
Polych...


No comments:
Post a Comment